The Renner-Brenner Site Park

This site is not financially associated with the City of  Riverside or any other funding, other than your donations.  This is a privately owned sited by Gary Brenner for everyone.

When you donate, please make a note on the donation form that this is for archaeology.

You can search this site here.  Fill in the blank line with your search, then hit the Google Search bar and it will bring up what it can find here.

mounds & vaults

INTRODUCTION
G. Brenner

The earliest accounts reported 25 (West 1907) within the group area. By 1910, Fowkes reported only 18 remaining.  Out of the 18, there are only reports on about 14 of those and that by that time, there was no remaining useful information to obtain. (Fowkes 1910 , p 65) 

There has been no single comprehensive attempt to assemble results regarding the Renner Site  mounds and burial vaults that were around the Renner Site.  This is that attempt. 

There are no other places in the world with stone chambered mounds such as these and in the quantity than those that were in Riverside.  The Riverside mounds were unique in two ways.  The first is they weren't necessarily at the end of the highest ridge.  Second is they were stone chambered with obvious door ways.

The problem is none of the early explorers and trained professionals, recorded enough information that was probably due to the lack of time.  Most only spent a day or a weekend.

Some recent work around mounds in Ohio are suggesting that groups of mounds on the east bank of a river [such as found in Riverside]  were actually placed as directional and/or time markers for the soltice, equinox and other important dates.

There has not been proven beyond doubt that any of the burial mounds were tied to the Renner Site, other than some common sense. There were some pottery fragments and projectile points, but the archaeological attempts in the late 1800's were done before Shippee's discovery of the Renner Site in 1921. Nobody, prior to Fowke's salvage operation in 1907, had contributed anything much of value besides the size of the stone vaults.  Most didn't even record their locations with any degree of accuracy.

There was some attempt at analyzing the bones where the excavators found skeletons of a "diminutive" (very small) nature, up to giants as much as 7' 5" tall.

If people could build amazing dry laid rock with amazing perfection for the deceased, why didn't they build their homes that way in the village?  We don't and never will know, if these stone vaults were also used as homes.  The Woodland people did much more stranger things than that, but the scientific community rules it out simply because it doesn't fit their agenda.  In other regions similar to the Renner mounds, bodies were found buried outside of the vaults as well as underneath.  These kinds of exploration were not done here.  Pottery fragments and projectile points were reported from the vaults, so I'm not sure what other village debris they would need to decide if it could have been a home.

There was quite a bit of noise made about what direction the bodies were laying and which way the door pointed, but not so much as to what that meant anyway.  Some appeared to have been brushed out of the way to make room for more bodies,  or for more space.

Some also believe there were walls and ceilings above the stone vaults that were made of materials similar to adobe bricks.   Otherwise, we don't really know what they had for roofs- if any.   It would have been foolish to pile up about 1,200, 25 lb stones and then not cover it. 

It's now known that at least two groups of "modern" [before 1820] native Americans had villages within a half mile of the mounds and there was a written testimony from a witness who saw members of one of these groups digging into the mounds themselves.     (see 1872 newspaper article further below)

Because I am not an college educated professional, I was not able to research all the reports that may have been available and could only do the best I could working around whomever came up with that stupid rule.                                                                          

This is not one of the Riverside mounds, but based on the reports from West, Lykens,  Curtis, Broadhead and Fowke, this is a very good representation of how one might have appeared in 1877.


WEDEL'S IMPRESSIONS (1943, P 14)

Here is 2009 Google map of Riverside [Renner site in red circle]   and the hand drawn map by Shippee in 1947 which shows every known site at the time as well as the 20 prehistoric burial sites circled in red.  The Shippee map is the only map I can find with all the mound locations.  

HISTORY

The Brenner family settled the area in 1844 and the first mention of any of the mounds were in W.M. Paxton's Annals of Platte County, published in 1897 in a diary form and told of the mounds in the early 1870's. 

The only [actual from being on site]  written reports were from:

E. Putnam West  1877
Lykins 1878
Curtiss 1879
 Professor Broadhead  1880
 Professor Fowke   1907, 1910
    Mett Shippee 1920, 1935, 1937, 47
Chapman 1947 [no published report found) 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CARBON DATES

The only dates we have were done by Crane & Griffin (University of Michigan)  in either 1958 or 1959 and were believed to be from the Curtis mounds, 23PL29.  23PL29 were two large earth mounds. 

M400-  A.D.  300  +/- 150

M399-  A.D.   490  +/-  150

VAULT CONSTRUCTION


Here are Judge Wests accounts and remember he was the first to "scientifically excavate" and the first to document what he first saw.


The Pixley mounds desribed below are the same group that were on the Peter Brenner farm.

Alana Holste [a facebook member] :    Some groups of Native Americans have legends about a tribe of giants. Growth hormones can help decide the size of a person. As more research including investigating of burial sites around the world some of the myths are being found to be true rather than just myth. This is partially why, although part of me accepts, returning body parts to their original group's I also object to not doing more research on them before returning. Many of the parts now in various collections have only been listed in a catalog and not been looked at since they were donated often a century or more agoNew Paragraph


None of the mounds or vaults were totally excavated.  This is number of skeletons, or pieces of skeletons,  reported between the five individuals who excavated.



MAPPING THE MOUNDS
I started with this drawing from Shippee (1940) in a letter to Wedel. 

Broadhead's Map (1878)
His drawing shows the 4 Brenner mounds [vaults] on the left and didn't include any of the Keller group. 



                                                                                      REVISED MAP AS OF 11/12/2022


This map is a combination of everything I could find where I used Google Earth's measuring tool and it's 3D technology to get as close as I possibly could to the information I could find.   Shippee, (1940) and Broadhead, (1880) had provided some measurements between the Brenner and Keller mound groups and the rest was based on a 1937 topography map.  The mound and vault positions are more accurate in the bottom photo, however the top one is easier to see.
The issue I ran into early on was that West, Broadhead, Lykins, Curtiss, (everyone) didn't know the full coverage of the all the mounds until Shippee produced a map in 1947, and even that map didn't show the full extent probably because of Shippee's lack of access to the information.  It should also be noted after reading mostly West, Lykins, Curtiss and Broadhead's reports, that none of them spent much more than one day or a weekend on their research.  

This map only shows known prehistoric burials and I have intentionally left out all other recorded sites in the map view other than the Renner Site. 

FROM LEFT TO RIGHT ON THE MAP:

 Renner Mound, 23PL30: [Out of view on the top map]
  Shippee 1920, 1934 and 37. Approximately 60 feet in diameter and about 6 feet tall, with notes revisited (1967:37).  In a personal letter to Wedel (Nov 9, 1937), Shippee reported remains of at least 10 individuals and that the mound was never fully excavated. 

 23PL24   [Out of view on top map]
  Vault. No other information was found other than Shippee recorded it and had reported it in his 1937, November letter to Dr. Wedel (Nov 9, 1937).  In that letter, he said "It might be well to record here that it pointed back along the ridge to the north where there is some evidence of a cemetery."

Boy Scouts 1927   [Out of view on top map]
I could find nothing on this except Shippee reported it on his 1940 survey.  However Lykins, (1878, p 251) may have been referring to this as the vault overlooking the Line Creek on the east side.  There is some evidence Broadhead (1878) may have excavated in 1878.  [See article further below.]

23PL25 
Was a group of three vaults that were on the south ridge about 40 feet apart and together form a triangle.  Shippee recorded it and Broadhead mentions it in his 1880 papers (p352).   I couldn't find any other information other than they were vaults. 

Brenner Mound Group. 1,2,3, 4,5,6 & 7
All except #4 were vaults where it was an earth mound. Mound #1 was recorded by West, 1877 (p16), Lykins, 1878 (p251), Broadhead 1880 (p352), Fowke 1910 (p70), Chapman 1947. [note: I could not find a report by Chapman, only notes made by Shippee that Chapman was there].  Stone lined vault with interior measurements of 7' 9" x 7" 9", with wall 36" tall with rock lined doorway to the south. Lykins did not recognize this as a vault, possibly because of West's work the year before. 

Mound #2.  Broadhead, 1880 numbered this as mound #6.  Fowke, 1910, numbered this as mound two as well as Lykins, 1878. .  Same measurements and details as Brenner mound #1.

Mound #3.  Fowkes, 1910 (p70), Lykins, 1878 (p251).  Same as Brenner vaults #1 and 2, except slightly larger and the doorway was facing east.

Mound #4.  Earth mound.   Lykins, 1878 [refers to this as mound #1 in his report],  Broadhead, 1880 and Fowkes 1910.   This mound was 100 feet southeast of Brenner mound #2.  Recorded as 50 feet in diameter and 5 feet tall.

The other three were just east of the Brenner group and were stove vault mounds.

23PL29.
These were two large earth mounds only separated by 75 feet (Shippee, 1947).   Both were recorded by Shippee (1940) to be oval shaped at 65 x 30 feet in diameter and five feet high. Excavated by West, 1877, Lykins, 1878, Curtiss, 1879, Broadhead, 1880, Curtis and Putnam 1880 and Fowke, 1910.  There was a lone vault mound just west of these two.

Keller Mound Group.
Were all stone lined burials consisting of five vaults.  West (1877), Fowkes (1910) and Shippee reported on these as well as Curtiss and Putnam 1879 by the Peabody Museum.  Because of the lack of evidence, but easier access, it's likely everyone who has reported investigated these.  


Note:  References to "Putnam" are references to E. P. West, where the "P" stands for Putnam.

1951 view looking north during the flood of 51 and second  photo is of 2007, then 2018 similar view. 

1951
Looking south over Indian Hills towards Fairfax

Below

1951, Looking west on West Platte towards the bluff where the Renner Mound was.

About the same view today.


MOUND SUMMARIES

Lykins (1878, p252)
2nd paragraph is discussing Brenner mound 2. 
Putnam (1880, p 718)
Broadhead (1880, pgs 350 & 352)
Fowke (1910, p57)

MOUNDS AND VAULTS

When they were first seen in the 1800's, both mounds and vaults would have appeared as earth mounds until excavated.  Mounds with vaults were generally four feet tall and 30 feet in diameter and were of the late woodland.  Earth mounds were much larger, averaging 60 feet or more in diameter and as much as 6-10 feet high and are considered more of the KC Hopewell phase.

Fowke's (1910, p 65), provides us with West's previous work in 1877 where both West and Fowke provided good arguments that vaults may have first been homes  (more under Fowke's below) before becoming a burial.  Part of their arguments are why the work to have a doorway pointed southerly and stone walls nearly 36" tall. Except they are square, the idea they are describing is similar to the Alaskan igloos.  

Except that they all shared the same ridge near Renner, there is some evidence to support the idea only the mounds were associated with the Renner site (KC Hopewell) and that the vaults were from a different or slightly later time frame where all were within the woodland period. 

Using an average of known carbon dates with the KC region, mounds generally were constructed in the 150 AD time era and vaults more into the 550 AD era.
The first permanent moden settlers around the Renner site began in 1844. Before that, there were a few cabins built by hunters from east who came whenever to hunt.

The first documented notes on the mounds were by Judge A. E. West in 1875, who was from Kansas City. By 1910, most all or parts of all the burials had been partially destoryed either through scientific attempts or residental efforts.

While researching this project, I relized West, Broadhead, Fowke's and even Chapman were not aware of the scope of the total number of mounds and vaults.  

It wasn't until Mett Shippee began to assemble all this information in the 1930's that the scope of the numbers of burials began to come into focus where he produced that is still the only known map of the burials in 1947. 

By 1875, all the burial sites were already at least 1,200 years old, even on a generous scale and is more than enough time for simple tree growth to destroy and disguise what had been built.

All the early archaeologists report that all appeared to be mounds as first glance and it wasn't until digging showed rock lined walls, etc.  There is even evidence the Curtis mound was actually a large stone vault where there were found remnants of a partial rock wall. 

Out of the 20 first reported mounds, three were mounds and 17 were stoned lined “vaults”.  

The term “vault” is a modern day application to a belief. All were nearly exactly 8 feet square with two foot thick rock walls about three feet high. Most had door ways to the south where the entrance was also rock lined the same height about four feet out.  All but one, had a doorway pointed to the south,  which doesn't really make it a vault at all.  It makes it a storage place where it can be entered, so it is assumed they could be reused over and over?

There was an early theory these could have been homes and that was ruled out long ago by the lack of pottery, tools and object associated with a village---although, all have been reported to have been found at most of the burials. 

Broadhead and Fowke reported the rocks were layed with the precision of a modern day mason without the use of mortar.

There was no evidence what may have been a roof. It's a belief the top was with timbers which were thatched over to form a roof.

The amazing part is all this work was covered with dirt that was hand carried where each vault would appear as a dirt mound about 24 feet in diameter and 6 feet high. So, if you take a five gallon bucket and build a mound of earth, say only 2' high and 12' in diameter, that would be roughly 400 square feet of dirt, or about 200 five gallon buckets. With the carrying availability these prehistoric people had, probably 500 trips are closer.  You would have to build your bucket and construct something to dig the earth with, so it was a big deal that had to be thought out in advance and required a major community effort.  If you were a dying important person, you better have had your resting place made already or stay alive for about another month---unless it's winter--if so, you need to stay alive until the ground thaws.

West and Broadhead reported the centers appeard to have been dug in by relic hunters and apprently had ruled out the fact these could have had roofs that caved in.

So why did the walls have to be two feet thick and why were they of rock when they could have done the same thing out of wood. If the walls are rock, then why not the roof? Then after you go through all this effort, why do you cover the whole thing with dirt?  

Whatever the true meaning an purpose is for these vaults, is something we may never know or understand. We do know some were reused. Some showed signs of being burned like a crematory. Some skeletons were found in a sitting position, while others were laying flat. Most bodies were found incomplete.


E. P.  WEST
1877
West was the first to publish his findings after visiting the Brenner mound group in 1877.  He was a Kansas City judge who moonlighted his hobby at archaeology. (more will be added)

Lykins
1878
Lykins followed up on West's previous work the summer before with the Brenner mound group. (more will be added)

Broadhead
1878, investigation
1880, published
In the company with members of the Kansas City Academy of Science and the Kansas State Academy of Science, Broadhead spend one day exploring the Brenner mound group. A disturbing fact is although Broadhead was excellent at details, he may had done more damage in one day in that he managed to somehow investigate four mounds in one day.  These were the same mound group investigated by West and Lykins. (more will be added)

DRAWINGS BY BROADHEAD OF BRENNER MOUND #1

Curtiss & Putnam
1879
Curtiss and Putnam reported on three of the Keller mounds that were stoned lined vaults. 

In the formative years of American archaeology, training in field methodology was virtually nonexistent. So when Peabody Museum Director Frederic Ward Putnam began to build the young museum's collections, he often hired nonprofessional fieldworkers. Notable among them was Nashville resident Edwin Curtiss (1830-1880), who had worked as a contractor for government dam, bridge, and railroad projects before joining Putnam's archaeological excavations in the American Southeast in 1877. 

Fowke
1907 & 1910
Fowke's investigated the Brenner and Keller mound group in 1907 and was the first to provide photos of his work. 

Born Charles Mitchell Smith in Charleston Bottom, Mason County, Kentucky, near Maysville, his parents were John D. Smith and Sibella Smith.[1][4][5] He was the eldest of five children and the only one to survive to adulthood.[1][4]Fowke's mother died before he reached ten years of age.[4] He spent his childhood in Kentucky and was raised by his father and other relatives.[2] In 1887, he legally changed his name to Gerard Fowke, naming himself after a prominent American ancestor of his maternal grandmother, Elizabeth Fowke.[1][6] 


He worked as a bookkeeper and clerk in Nashville, Tennessee, before returning to Kentucky in 1873.[2][4] From 1873 to 1876, Fowke was a student and farmer in Kentucky.[4] In 1876, he moved to central Illinois, where he taught grammar school for two years.[2][4] He then taught in Brown County, Ohio, before taking a position as a grammar school principal in Sidney, Ohio, from 1879 to 1881.[2][4] In 1881, he took a class at Ohio State University in geology and archeology. After this course, he became interested enough in the subject to spend the rest of his life in the study of geology and archeology.[4] 

From 1911 to 1916, he worked for the Missouri Historical Society, studying the geology of the Saint Louis, Missouri area. Before this, he had studied geology in Ohio. Fowke also worked for the Jefferson Memorial in Saint Louis, setting up a collection there of Native American relics. He rearranged them in 1926, and set up a new collection in 1930.[9] 

Fowke's was the last of the early explorers to investigate the mounds and possibly the most educated at that point.  He believed there was evidence to support the idea the stone chambers were intended as places of occupation. [1910,p 65]

In Fowke's Words (1910, p 66)

These mounds were not covered with wood, because no traces of it are found; nor with stones, otherwise they would be in the vault.  If covered at all, and it is highly probable they were, the covering must have been of the brick clay of which they are composed, and which is well adapted to the purpose, made into a stiff mortar and arched over the chamber like a bake oven, with an opening for the escape of smoke at the top; or else of the skins of animals like a tent.

Many reasons seem to justify the conclusion that these chambers were dwelling places as well as places for interment.  The doorway in all the chambers opening to the south, the great thickness of the ash heaps on the floor of the chambers, the intermingling of the bones with the ashes, and the size of the chambers--are all significant facts.  ....................It is probable, from the situations in which the remains are found, covered with clay at no greater depth than the floor of the chamber, that successive interments, after the soft parts of the body had decayed, were made while the chamber was occupied as a dwelling, and so near the surface of the floor that bones were sometimes reached by domestic fire. 

PHOTOS BY FOWKE, EAST WALL BRENNER VAULT 1 &  SOUTH WALL AND NORTH WALL BRENNER VAULT  2

Below is Keller vault 2, west view.

(below) Keller vault 1, west view.

SCAN OF ACTUAL ORIGINAL FOWKE PHOTO OF THE NORTH WALL OF KELLER VAULT 2...  THESE PHOTOS DID NOT APPEAR IN THE FOWKE REPORT. 
PHOTOS WERE GIVEN TO GARY BRENNER BY METT SHIPPEE IN 1982
Brenner  Vault 2, south wall
KELLER MOUND 3 BY FOWKE
KELLER vault 1, south wall, amd vault 2 (direction not given) MOUNDS 1 AND 2. ORIGINAL PHOTOS BY FOWKE GIVEN TO BRENNER BY SHIPPEE 1982

A big question is if these people could construct these rock structures, then why didn't they build homes the same way or other rock structures here?  We don't really know that these people didn't use these structures as homes, even briefly.    None of the archaeologists reported digging down into clean subsoil.  Most reported the lithic debris continued.


Shippee 
1920, 1935, 1937, 1947 & 1967
[It was reported by Wedel (1943:143-145) that Trowbridge had also dug into the Renner mound]
Shippee was the first to produce a map of the mounds near the Renner site and the first to make a connection to the Renner site. (unpublished letter to Wedel, November 6, 1937).  Shippee was the only one to publish a report on the only mound west of Renner.  The Renner mound which he first excavated in 1920, a year before he discovered the Renner Site. 

On November 9, 1937, he sent a letter to Wedel about his work on the Renner mound.  This was after Wedel had spent June of that summer at the Renner site.  Wedel probably casually asked Shippee to send him the information on the burials.  Shippee would send other letters including one from March 18, 1940.

We learn that from the November 9 letter that Shippee reported he first investigated the Renner mound in 1920 and a second time in 1934.  

Below is his drawing at the bottom of the November 9th letter of the Renner mound.
SHIPPEE 1937, SCANNED AND CROPPED PHOTO OF HIS LETTER TO WEDEL
Share by: